Privacy Within Journalism – Does it Even Exist? Aggregated Post 2

The nature of journalism

The nature of journalism – image from: http://opinion.latimes.com

“Privacy Within Journalism – Does it Even Exist?”

Within today’s tech savvy society, people are able to access news stories with much more ease, allowing them to upload photos on media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram a lot faster. As reported in The Australian’s post,  “In the past 10 years the media has changed more rapidly than any large-scale global industry and the area most changed is news gathering and reporting.” Invasion of privacy by journalists is a very large issue, especially within today’s society, where it is occurring more than ever before.

For example, a parents’ worst nightmare was confirmed for Peter Lord and Linda Goldspink-Lord, whose 13-year-old daughter, Molly Lord, was tragically killed in a quad-biking accident in 2012.  The media immediately swarmed the property to capture footage of the tragedy, and it was reported  via the Crikey website’s post that Seven Network was “flying low in a helicopter and using a long lens to capture images of the family grieving over the deceased teenager’s body.”  It was also reported via the Daily Telegraph’s post that a number of journalists trespassed on the family’s property to gain access to further footage.

Molly’s mother took to Seven Network’s Facebook page to express her distress over the filming of such a horrible, and extremely private, moment. She stressed that Seven captured footage of her huddled over her deceased daughter. Seven aired this footage on their daily news program, before Molly’s mother even had the chance to inform her relatives.  The Facebook post was later removed by Seven, who claimed that it was “removed in error.” 

Molly Lord's mother, Linda Goldspink-Lord, took to posting on Network Seven's Facebook wall to express her disgust over their conduct during the worst time of her life.

Molly Lord’s mother, Linda Goldspink-Lord, took to posting on Network Seven’s Facebook page to express her disgust over their conduct during the worst time of her life.

Molly’s parents sued Seven Network, the Illawarra Mercury and WIN News for their actions. These media organisations initially denied said allegations, which can be viewed via the Daily Telegraph’s post.  Seven argued that “filming and broadcasting of images did not give rise to any compensable loss.” Meanwhile, WIN News argued that “the broadcast exposed a public safety issue in the danger of quad bikes by children.”  These media organisations eventually apologised to the family, which can be viewed via the Crikey website’s postwhen they “admitted their reporting caused great distress to the Lord family and they should have shown more sensitivity.”  Meanwhile, the Australian’s post reported that Seven had yet to apologise for their insensitivity, while Sydney Morning Herald’s post recounted that Seven had apologised via their Facebook page.  These journalistic pieces contrast and display different information, which is also an integral issue in journalism.

A further example of invasion of privacy as an issue in journalism is the incident of the two Dutch journalists who were on trial for allegedly invading the privacy of an escaped Nazi War Criminal, Heinrich Boere in 2012.  These two journalists were later released from the charges, but the allegations remained that they used a hidden camera to film their interview with Boere.  These issues, and the events that followed Molly Lord’s tragic death, demonstrate the ongoing issue of ethics and privacy invasion in journalism and the unknown events that occur thereafter.

Trust, Integrity And Simply Giving Credit – Plagiarism Is An Issue In Journalism – Aggregated Post 1

Trust, integrity and simply giving credit where it's due are among the tenets of journalism we hold dear (CNN, 2014).

Trust, integrity and simply giving credit where it’s due are among the tenets of journalism we hold dear. Image from http://thewrap.com

“Trust, Integrity And Simply Giving Credit Where It Is Due.”

Plagiarising in journalism is a major issue, especially in recent years. This is due to the significant increase of modern technology, meaning that technologies such as the Internet and social media have enabled journalists to manufacture practices including “copying” and “pasting” content from various websites, and either intentionally or unintentionally claiming other people’s work as their own, without acknowledging it.

One example of a recent and well-known plagiarism issue within the journalism industry is the story of former London Bureau CNN News Editor, Marie-Louise Gumuchian. An editor’s note was released on 16 May 2014 by CNN claiming that Gumuchian had plagarised in 128 separate instances during her career with them. This led to the termination of Gumuchian’s employment at CNN, and an investigation into her previous place of employment, Reuters, was launched. The reason for this was that it was discovered Gumuchian had plagarised her CNN stories from Reuters, and Reuters wanted to make sure that she did not also plagiarise under their employment as well.

According to the iMediaEthics website, CNN stated that “An unpublished story flagged last week during our editing process led to an internal investigation that uncovered other examples in about 50 published stories, and our investigation is ongoing.” CNN discovered Gumuchian’s plagiarism through a routine editing check, and then proceeded to further investigate this through ”plagiarism-flagging software” which displayed a number of plagiarism instances that Gumuchian had been involved in. CNN was then obligated to further examine all of her work, which uncovered an “insane number of problems.” CNN then had to remove some of their published articles, while editing others down, and flagging them with an editor’s note to explain the situation.

Editor's note

The editor’s note that CNN used when explaining Gumuchian’s plagiarism to clients.

Another well-known example of plagiarism within the journalism industry is that of Jayson Blair, who was accused of plagiarising whilst working for the New York Times. Some sources such as Fox News speak negatively of Blair, with the author revealing “From the moment I got Jayson Blair on the phone 11 years ago, I knew he was a liar.”  This contrasts significantly against the Washington Post website which casts Blair in a much lighter nature.  This demonstrates that sources are sometimes subjective and recounted differently.

Plagiarising is a very serious issue in journalism, and avoiding it is essential. It is likely that Gumuchian, like Blair, will now be a household name due to the extensive media coverage of her story, and it will be very difficult for her to find employment in the future. Journalists must give credit where credit is due in order to avoid unknown situations such as these.